27 April 06 - 06:29Tangible Benefirst of IdM
A blog entry on just the "tangible benefits". Not worth quibbling. Nice to see someone thinking this way. Another IAM posting. (more)
- Identity - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
This is the archive page for Connexitor Blog. Click to go to the frontpage of this site.
| « | July 2010 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2006
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2006
01 May - 31 May 2006
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2006
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2006
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2006
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2006
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2006
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2006
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2006
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2007
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2007
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2007
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2007
01 May - 31 May 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2007
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2007
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2007
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2007
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2007
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2007
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2008
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2008
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2008
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2008
01 May - 31 May 2008
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2008
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2008
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2008
Symas
OpenLDAP
HP
PADL Software
Suretec Systems
A blog entry on just the "tangible benefits". Not worth quibbling. Nice to see someone thinking this way. Another IAM posting. (more)
- Identity - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
Dave Kearns would like to think so. It's an interesting question.
Is security about security? Is Sarbanes Oxley about security? Or is Identity as much an enabler, a way of opening things up as much as it is a gate? (more)
- Identity - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Now, we're not necessarily experts on Sarbanes Oxley. In fact, we'd be the first to note that we haven't read the law, let alone 1% of the articles. But people have come asking if Connexitor Directory Services (CDS) can help.
It can. Like any good directory, CDS (Symas's convenient distributions of OpenLDAP) can help address several of the most pressing IT requirements of Sarbanes Oxley. Read on ... (more)
- CDS - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
A good day for treasure troves of LDAP info. This collection of links is from a Sun-centric source, so much of it will only be of interest to those unfortunate souls running SunOne Directory Server, Red Hat Directory Services or Fedora Directory Services (the children of the Netscape/Sun iPlanet collaboration). OpenLDAP has diverged from the original U. Mich base they all share in different ways and I doubt they'll do much for the OpenLDAP crowd but you never know. There may be a jewel in there for the faithful (and lucky).
Thanks to WhoAmI for the link. (more)
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
The blog entry Understanding Directory Server DB Growth is a clear explanation. Lots of concise and useful information. It raises some questions about comparison to the current OpenLDAP software (2.3.21 with 2.4 on the horizon). (more)
- OpenLDAP - five comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Apropos of nothing. I was reading the RSS feeds and ran into an article I simply won't bother linking to. It was a thinly veiled commercial for yet another Identity Management conference and the prose just got to me. Follow the "more" link for the rant, if you care. (more)
- Identity - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
I sit here in awe. This blog entry pretty much says it all.
Bottom line: "Beware Enterprise IT Architecture." Right answer. It's not a distillation of wisdom, it's an accretion of political flotsam. Just my $0.02 endorsement.
- Open Source - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
In the midst of a SLAMD OpenLDAP benchmark, Howard Chu (Chief Architect of Symas) installed a new back-bdb module with a modification of the cache freeing algorithm. We got something between 40 and 50% improvement in LDAP search rate searching on a database way too big for the cache. That's only really important if you've got a big directory and not enough RAM to hold it all in memory.
Just thought you'd want to know what's coming.
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Actually, we're being a little opaque in that last major post. We don't really think that sucha a small and simple test proves that, for most real deployments, Connexitor Directory Services (CDS, Symas's convenient, tested, and certified distribution of OpenLDAP) is twice as fast as Fedora Directory Services (FDS).
It feels good to poke fun using something like that but we're big proponents of quality transparent benchmark data. Our most recent real benchmark of OpenLDAP versus the predecessor to FDS didn't show such enormous performance advantages. But that was then. (more)
- CDS - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Not much of a test, but a user ran a trivial test against OpenLDAP and Fedora Directory Services and had a twelve to one difference (OpenLDAP did in 1 second what it took FDS 12). After indexing a couple of fields, they got to two to one, no comment about whether OpenLDAP was indexed. (more)
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Well, HP is beginning to spend the bucks in our name. This IT Manager's Journal ad mentions us down a ways.
It's nice to be billed equally with JBoss, BEA, MySQL, and Oracle. It is a shame they didn't link to us
(more)
- Symas - No comments / one trackback - § ¶
An IBM Red Book (I remember when a) they were red books and b) they were a new idea) on "Integrating AIX into a Heterogenous LDAP Environment" doesn't mention OpenLDAP!? What rock are they living under? has a nice chapter (Chapter 7) on integrating OpenLDAP.
Teach me to open my mouth before I READ the doc. Thanks to Roger Moquin for calling me out and setting me straight! (more)
- OpenLDAP - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
Fear and Trembling! TechNewsWorld writing about a Forrester Research report "Vendors Refine Their Open Source Strategies/The Risk of Subverting Open Source Freedoms Mounts" goes with "Threatens". I guess it's easier to understand than Subverts ... particularly now that Subversion is the name of an Open Source version control system. The TechNewsWorld article leads with a strong rebuttal from a Red Hat spokesman. We generally agree with Red Hat. (more)
- Open Source - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
Jan-Piet Mens challenged a claim that "the Fedora Directory Server (nee Netscape Directory Server) blows away OpenLDAP for large scale LDAP deployments". He doubts it ... so do we. (more)
- OpenLDAP - one comment / No trackbacks - § ¶
- CDS - No comments / No trackbacks - § ¶
- No comments - § ¶
- No comments - § ¶
For those among us who want an export to personal calendars (why you wouldn't just point them at an CDS, OpenLDAP Directory is beyond me) there's an LDIF to vCard PERL script.
- No comments - § ¶
- No comments - § ¶
- No comments - § ¶